The scientist who suggested that genetically modified foods could damage health - and was comprehensively rubbished by Government ministers and the scientific establishment as a result - is to have his reputation dramatically vindicated.
Britain's top medical journal, The Lancet is shortly to publish Arpad Puzstai's research showing changes in the guts of rats fed with GM potatoes. This will re-ignite fears that eating GM foods may endanger human health.
The Government has sought to discredit Dr Puzstai's work on the grounds that it has not been published in a peer-reviewed scientific journal. Other scientists have made similar claims and attacked it as "flawed" and unpublishable.
The Independent on Sunday (Britain)
77 CONTENTS Translate Links Events Books HOME Foot 79
Publication of the article will encourage other scientists to try to repeat the experiments, kickstarting further scientific investigation into whether GM foods pose a threat to health or not.
Galley proofs of the article have already been sent to Dr Puzstai, and his co-author Dr Stanley Ewen, Senior lecturer in Pathology at Aberdeen University. Late last week David McNamee, the journal's Executive Editor, said that it will be published "soon."
The research is important because few papers have so far been published on the health effects of GM foods, despite the rapidity with which they spread onto supermarket shelves. Indeed Dr Puzstai - who was travelling in Europe last week and unable to comment on the news - began his experiments because he could find only one previous peer-reviewed study, led by a scientist from Monsanto, the GM food giant, which had found no ill-effects.
He started three years research - funded by the Scottish Office to the tune of £1.6 million - at Aberdeen's Rowett Research Institute as a self-confessed "very enthusiastic supporter" of GM technology, who fully expected his experiments to give it "a clean bill of health."
The 68 year-old scientist, who has published 270 scientific papers and is acknowledged as the leading authority in his field, fed rats on three strains of genetically-engineered potatoes and one ordinary one. In his first full interview, after being gagged by his institute, he told the Independent on Sunday last March; " I was absolutely confident I wouldn't find anything. But the longer I spent on the experiments, the more uneasy I became."
His findings sparked public concern, and ignited a furious row about GM foods, after he briefly mentioned them, with the Institute's permission, on a television programme last year. They contradicted repeated assurances from the Prime Minister [Tony Blair] down, that GM food is safe, and undermined the assumption behind the regulation of genetically-altered crops that there is no substantial difference between them and their conventional equivalents.
Despite his eminence, Dr Puztai - who came to Britain after the suppression of the 1956 Hungarian rising because of the country's "tolerance" - underwent one of the most extraordinary treatments ever meted out to a reputable scientist.
He was suspended from his work on the experiments, his computers were sealed, his data confiscated and he found himself "sent to Coventry" by his colleagues. He was forced into retirement and forbidden to talk about his work.
He came under comprehensive attack from ministers and the scientific establishment. Sir Robert May, the Government's Chief Scientific Adviser, accused him of violating "every canon of scientific rectitude".
The Royal Society claimed that his work was "flawed in many aspects of design, execution and analysis" and said that "no conclusions could be drawn from it." And Professor Tom Sanders, of Kings College, London said that none of the major scientific journals would publish the research.
Ministers enthusiastically joined in. Cabinet enforcer Dr Jack Cunningham, who is in charge of the Government's GM strategy, said Dr Pusztai's work had been "comprehensively discredited" , and top Downing Street advisers consistently stressed it should be disregarded because it had not been published in a peer-reviewed journal.
Dr Pusztai retorted that he was eager to publish, and pointed out that the
scientific criticism was based on incomplete information that he had put
on the internet at the Institute's request, while being denied full access
to his data, which was only released to him this spring. -- Geoffrey Lean,
The Independent on Sunday, London, "Expert on GM danger vindicated,"
Sunday October 3, 1999.
** NOTICE: In accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. Section 107, this material is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving the included information for research and educational purposes. **
The newspaper's homepage is at http://www.independent.co.uk/ Received by courtesy of MichaelP.
11 Oct 1999: It has been reported that the scientific referees have objected, saying that the article was incorrect, and that Lancet ought not to publish it.
07 Oct 1999: Although Monsanto has announced suspension of work on its TERMINATOR GENE, I recommend continuing the campaign against it. Monsanto was trying to patent it in Australia. A form to send an e-mail to U.S. authorities is at: http://www.rafi.org/usda.html
with AOLPress/2.0™ 03 Oct
1999 (10kb, links checked 03Oct99), last revised 06 June 2000
77 Top ^ ^ CONTENTS Translate Links Events Books HOME 79
DOCUMENT 78: URL = http://www.multiline.com.au/~johnm/modified.htm
To translate whole Webpages into Français, Deutsch, Italiano, Português, and Español out of English, or out of those languages into English, click: http://www.altavista.digital.com/ For these and 11 other languages including Esperanta and Latina, one word at a time, click: http://dictionaries.travlang.com/
John Massam, 46 Cobine Way, Greenwood (a Perth suburb), WA, 6024, Australia. Tel [+61 8] (08) 9343 9532, Mobile 0408 054 319 firstname.lastname@example.org